MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060002611 · doi:10.1255/ejms.688

Fragmentation of Singly Charged Silver/ α,ω-Diaminoalkane Complexes: Competition between the Loss of H <sub>2</sub> and AgH Molecules

2004· article· en· W2060002611 on OpenAlexafffund
Tujin Shi, Junfang Zhao, Tamer Shoeib, K. W. Michael Siu, Alan C. Hopkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Mass Spectrometry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersYork University
KeywordsChemistryFragmentation (computing)IminiumDissociation (chemistry)IonMoleculeDensity functional theoryComputational chemistryBasis setCrystallographyPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Collision-induced dissociation of complexes, Ag + /NH 2 CH 2 (CH 2 ) n CH 2 NH 2 , where n has values of 0, 1, 2 and 3, show loss of one H 2 molecule at low energies. For the largest complex ( n = 3), a second H 2 molecule is also lost. For complexes with n = 0 and 1, loss of AgH (the only pathway observed in the fragmentation of Ag + /monoamine complexes) also occurs at low collision energies and this becomes the dominant fragmentation pathway at centre-of-mass energies above 2 eV. For complexes with n = 2 and 3, negligible amounts of product ions resulting from loss of only AgH were formed. However, for these complexes, the major products at higher collision energies result from loss of either AgH plus NH 3 or, more likely, H 2 plus AgNH 2 ; the product ions are postulated to be cyclic iminium ions. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations (B3LYP with a DZVP basis set) on Ag + /NH 2 CH 2 (CH 2 ) 2 CH 2 NH 2 showed the loss of H 2 followed by AgNH 2 to have a slightly lower barrier than loss of AgH plus NH 3 . For complexes with n = 2 and 3, there are minor losses of various combinations of AgH, H 2 , 2H 2 and NH 3 . Reaction profiles for the losses of H 2 and AgH from all four Ag + /α,ω-diamine complexes have been examined computationally using DFT calculations. The second step on the reaction profile, loss of either H 2 or AgH from the complex between Ag + and α-amino-γ-imino-propane, Ag + /NH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CHNH, has also been calculated. The highest energy transition state on the profiles to loss of both H 2 and AgH from the smallest complex ( n = 0) are identical; on all the other profiles, the barrier for H 2 loss is lower than that for AgH loss (by 2.5 kJ mol −1 when n = 1, by 13.4 kJ mol −1 when n = 2 and by 33.0 kJ mol −1 when n = 3). Fragmentation of the ligand backbone occurs most extensively for ions derived from the Ag + /NH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 NH 2 . After loss of H 2 , the product ion, Ag + /NH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH = NH fragments via a transition state in which the CH 2 –CH 2 bond is breaking, while a 1,5-hydrogen shift from one nitrogen to the other is occurring. Cleavage of the carbon chain of NH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH = NH 2 + occurs at relatively low energy; DFT calculations provide a mechanism by which H 2 C = NH plus CH 3 CH = NH 2 + are produced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Mass SpectrometrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207