Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les organisateurs et organisatrices communautaires (OC) exercent une fonction de liaison qui s’est transformée au fil des diverses périodes de mise en oeuvre de l’approche communautaire et territoriale depuis les CLSC (Centres locaux de service communautaire) jusqu’aux Centres de santé et de services sociaux (CSSS). Avec la multiplication des approches intersectorielles et des métiers du développement dont les pratiques relèvent aussi de l’organisation communautaire, cette fonction s’est aussi diversifiée. Les fonctions, dont la liaison, constituent un angle mort de la littérature québécoise et nord-américaine sur l’organisation communautaire. La recherche a mis en évidence l’importance du contexte politique dans lequel est mise en oeuvre la fonction de liaison et permis de montrer qu’elle repose sur l’exercice de compétences pratiques : connaître le milieu, mobiliser les acteurs, garantir la cohésion du système local d’action, démocratiser les rapports au pouvoir et rendre accessibles les ressources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".