MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060060388 · doi:10.5539/cis.v2n3p3

A Hybrid Resource Allocation Strategy with Queuing in Wireless Mobile Communication Networks

2009· article· en· W2060060388 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K. Venkatachalam, P. Balasubramanie

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer and Information Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkHandoverQuality of serviceChannel allocation schemesQueueing theoryResource allocationBlocking (statistics)Cellular networkCall blockingWirelessChannel (broadcasting)Radio resource managementWireless networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of third and future wireless mobile communication networks is to provide services efficiently to the mobile users in all environments. In wireless mobile Communication the channel allocation and quality of service are the major factors and important issues to decide the system performance. Here in our work a Hybrid Channel Allocation(HCA)strategy for channel allocation and queuing technique applied to Hybrid Channel Allocation strategy for Quality of Service(QoS) provisioning are implemented. The proposed HCA strategy considers new calls in Fixed Channel Allocation (FCA) method and handoff calls in Dynamic Channel Allocation (DCA) method to reduce the call blocking and call dropping probabilities. The application of queuing technique applied to HCA strategy increases the efficiency of the cellular system performance especially in micro and pico cellular environments and effectively utilize the available allocated radio spectrum. The performance shows the decrease in call blocking and dropping and an increased number of users in the available channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer and Information ScienceSame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207