Response of a Vertical Axis Wind Turbine to Time Varying Wind Conditions Found within the Urban Environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experimental testing of a vertical axis wind turbine within the urban environment was used to assess the effects that unsteady wind conditions have on the aerodynamic performance of the turbine. Temporal variation of the wind with respect to the direction and velocity fluctuations was quantified and the corresponding performance of the experimental turbine was compared to the base case wind tunnel performance. Theoretical analysis indicated that the performance of the turbine should depend on wind speed fluctuations, while remaining relatively independent of direction fluctuations. Experimental testing confirmed the independence of the direction fluctuations and quantified the impact of the wind speed fluctuations on the turbine performance. The wind speed fluctuations ( I v = based on a 10 s averaging interval) exhibited minimal impact on the performance for I v < 0.15, while for greater fluctuations the performance decreased with a roughly linear relationship with increasing I v .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it