MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060073371 · doi:10.2514/1.15869

Real-Time Dynamic Optimization of Controllable Linear Systems

2006· article· en· W2060073371 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtremum Seeking Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Optimal controlTrajectory optimizationOptimization problemFlatness (cosmology)TrajectoryMathematical optimizationController (irrigation)Computer scienceMathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A real-time optimization controller is developed to steer a linear time-varying control system to closed-loop trajectories that optimize a cost functional of interest. When advantage is taken of the differential flatness of the linear systems, a basis function approach is used to parameterize the open-loop trajectories of the system and to approximate the optimal solution of the finite time optimal control problem. An adaptive optimization method is used to formulate the real-time optimization scheme. The problem is posed as a real-time optimal trajectory generation problem in which the approximate optimal trajectories are computed using an extremum-seeking approach. The control algorithm provides tracking of the approximate optimal trajectories. Two optimal control problems are considered to demonstrate the application of the technique. It is shown that the technique can be successfully implemented in real time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it