Efficacy and Tolerability of Topical Tacrolimus Ointment for the Treatment of Male Genital Psoriasis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genital psoriasis is difficult to treat and has a significant psychological impact on affected patients. OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of topical tacrolimus ointment in male patients with genital psoriasis. METHODS: This was an open-label study in 12 male patients with genital psoriasis. Patients received topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment twice daily for 8 weeks followed by a 4-week observational period. Efficacy was assessed by a modification of the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scale adapted for genital psoriasis (male genital PASI). Severity was also evaluated individually for the glans, shaft of the penis, and scrotum. RESULTS: Male genital PASI decreased from a mean score of 15.8 at baseline to 1.2 at week 8 (p < .001). Psoriasis severity also improved significantly for the glans, shaft of the penis, and scrotum evaluated individually. Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment was very well tolerated, with only mild pruritus or burning sensation of limited duration reported. CONCLUSIONS: Topical tacrolimus ointment appears very efficacious and well tolerated in male patients with genital psoriasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".