MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060150115 · doi:10.1049/ip-gtd:20041198

Extraction of signals for harmonics, reactive current and network-unbalance compensation

2005· article· en· W2060150115 on OpenAlexaff
Masoud Karimi-Ghartemani, Mohammad Reza Iravani, Farid Katiraei

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Generation Transmission and Distribution · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)HarmonicsAC powerControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceHarmonicNonlinear systemCompensation (psychology)Electric power systemDigital signal processingSignal processingEngineeringPower (physics)VoltageElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nonlinear signal processing system for the simultaneous extraction of harmonic, reactive current and instantaneous symmetrical components is presented. The building block of the proposed system is an enhanced phase-locked which provides accurate and synchronised extraction of the desired signals. The behaviour of the system is demonstrated by means of simulation case studies. The algorithm adopted for the system is frequency-adaptive, immune to noise, and robust with respect to external disturbances and setting of the internal parameters. The proposed system can be used as the reference generator of FACTS and custom power controllers, e.g. an active power filter. Structural simplicity and robustness furnish the proposed system with ease of implementation and tuning on hardware/software platforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEE Proceedings - Generation Transmission and DistributionSame topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207