MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

American Migration, Settlement, and “Belonging” in Francophone Canada

2014· article· en· W2060150776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeographical Review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrenchImmigrationContext (archaeology)CensusPopulationPoliticsSettlement (finance)Canadian studiesHistoryEthnologyGender studiesSociologyGeographyGenealogyPolitical scienceMedia studiesDemographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractMore Americans now reside in Canada than at any time since the Vietnam War. Of particular note is the surprisingly large population of immigrants from the United States who now reside in Montreal—Francophone Canada's largest and most diverse city. This article documents and analyzes the migration experiences, spatial patterns, and "sense of belonging" of Americans in Montreal during the post–Vietnam era framed within the larger political and linguistic context of the city's "Two Solitudes." Findings are based on information compiled from archival materials, census records, structured and unstructured interviews, survey questionnaires, participant observation, and fieldwork. My overarching goal is to embed the experiences and patterns of this English‐speaking group of immigrants in predominately French‐speaking Montreal during the past five decades—one of the most dramatic and divisive periods of time in Montreal and in Quebec as a whole.KeywordsCanada–U.S. borderlandimmigrationFrancophoneAnglophoneMontreal Notes1. The term "American" is used throughout this article to refer to U.S.–born residents of Quebec and other parts of Canada. I am aware that this term actually encompasses all residents of both North and South America (and thus could be viewed as being used inappropriately here to describe only people from the United States). However, since Canadians refer to migrants from the U.S. as "Americans," it is the most appropriate term to use for this particular analysis. For purposes of this study, the terms "English‐speakers," "English‐speaking community," "English‐speaking population," and "Anglophones" are used interchangeably. Likewise, "Francophones" includes "French‐speakers," "French‐speaking community," and "French‐speaking population."2. Note that although very little has been published to date related to U.S. immigrants in Francophone Canada, an emerging body of work does exist on other groups of English‐speaking immigrants in French Canada. Examples include a special issue of Canadian Diversity/Diversité canadienne about Quebec's many ethno‐cultural and ethno‐racial Anglophone communities (2010); a statistical portrait of Anglophone minorities in Canada by Jean‐Pierre Corbeil, Brigitte Chavez, and Daniel Pereira (2010); the work of Montreal historian, Jack Jedwab (2004; 2008a; 2008b; 2010); and other related research published by Lorraine O'Donnell (2010) and other scholars active in the Quebec Anglophone Research Network.3. A notable exception to the almost complete absence of recent work on Americans in Francophone Canada is a brief statistical study by Paul‐André Linteau in 2000 on a few of the historical flows of U.S.–Quebec migrants between 1791 and 1940.4. Although comparative research on recent U.S. immigration to Anglophone Canada and Canadian immigration to the U.S. has become more plentiful in recent years, these studies by scholars such as Jack Jedwab (2004; 2008a; 2008b; 2010); Susan Hardwick (2009; 2010), Susan Hardwick and Heather Smith (2012), and Audrey Kobayashi and Brian Ray (2006) say little or nothing about the distinctive incorporation experiences or sense of belonging of U.S. immigrants in Francophone Canada.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSusan W. HardwickDr. Hardwick is professor emerita of geography at the University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403; [susanh@uoregon.edu].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it