The crustal structure of the southern Nain and Makkovik provinces of Labrador derived from refraction seismic data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data from a refraction seismic profile parallel to the coast of Labrador (Canada) were used to determine the crustal structure across the boundary of the Nain and Makkovik provinces, and to look for evidence for an offshore continuation of the Mesoproterozoic Nain Plutonic Suite (NPS). Seven seismometers recorded airgun shots along the 283 km long line. P- and S-wave velocity models were developed from forward and inverse modeling of travel times. The velocity model distinguishes three distinct zones. In the Saglek block of the Nain Province, the crust is divided into three layers with P-wave velocities between 5.8 and 6.9 km/s. Farther to the south, upper crustal velocities increase to 6.3–6.5 km/s and the Poisson’s ratio increases from 0.24 to 0.27. This zone correlates with a gravity low that is interpreted to outline the offshore continuation of the NPS. The upper crustal velocities are intermediate between anorthositic and granitoid rock samples collected from the NPS. A lower crustal reflector is limited to the area underneath the NPS and may be related to dioritic magmas. Mid-crustal and lower crustal velocities do not vary along the line and no underplating was detected. Within the Makkovik Province, upper crustal velocities of 5.9–6.2 km/s may indicate a dioritic composition similar to the Island Harbour Bay plutonic suite. Moho depth varies between 28 and 36 km with the maximum beneath the NPS. The variations could not be linked to effects of the Makkovikian orogeny but are thought to relate to Mesozoic rifting in Labrador Sea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".