MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2060171159 · doi:10.1118/1.2760534

SU‐FF‐J‐29: Preliminary Experimental Study for Tumor Position Tracking During Radiotherapy Using Positron Emission Markers

2007· article· en· W2060171159 on OpenAlexaff
Tingfa Xu, Robert A. deKemp, Richard Wassenaar, Marc Chamberland

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPositron emission tomographyPhysicsTracking (education)Nuclear medicinePositronRadiation therapyPoint sourcePosition (finance)FluoroscopyPositron emissionMedical imagingRadiationOpticsMedical physicsMedicineNuclear physicsRadiologyElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To experimentally evaluate the feasibility of tumor position tracking using positron emission markers for external beam radiation therapy. Method and Materials: Clinical PET imaging is known to be limited by its low spatial resolution of approximately 4–10 mm. However, if the geometry of the source is known, the position of the sources can be determined with sub‐millimeter accuracy. We propose to apply this concept for real‐time tumor position tracking during radiotherapy. For pulmonary and abdominal tumors, delivering accurate radiation therapy is limited by the motion of the tumor as the patient breathes. By implanting positron emission markers into tumor, and using pairs of position‐sensitive detectors to track the resulting annihilation gamma rays, the position of the tumor can be tracked in real‐time with high accuracy. Positron emission based technique will deliver a lower radiation dose to normal tissue than x‐ray fluoroscopy, and the smaller size of the positron emission markers reduces risk to the patient during implantation. The concept and simulation study has been previously published (T. Xu et.al, Med. Phys. 33(7) p2598). In this feasibility study, the technique was evaluated using a clinical PET system (CTI ECAT). A Ge‐68 Linear source was used to simulate a point source in 2D slices during conventional 2D acquisition. The Ge‐68 source was put at 3 locations and the data were combined to simulate multiple (3) markers. Results: Three point sources were successfully localized using proposed technique. The localization precision ranges from 4 mm down to 0.2 mm when the number of coincident events used increases from 100 to 4100. The precession reaches 0.77 mm with only about 200 events from three point sources. Conclusion: The study has shown that multiple positron emission markers can be localized with sub‐millimeter precision, which is sufficient for tumor localization during radiotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→