MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060174242 · doi:10.1109/pvsc.2014.6925019

Correlation of dynamical, vibrational and optical properties in c-Si with bond-centered-hydrogen and other hydrogen complexes

2014· article· en· W2060174242 on OpenAlexaff
Z. A. Ibrahim, A. Shkrebtii, Frederick Zimmer-De Iuliis, F. Gaspari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimerMetastabilityHydrogen bondHydrogenMaterials scienceDielectricPhysical chemistryPhysicsCrystallographyTopology (electrical circuits)ChemistryComputational chemistryOptoelectronicsNuclear magnetic resonanceMoleculeQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen, introduced into crystalline (c-) or amorphous (a-) silicon (Si), plays an important role in improving Si properties for photovoltaics application. Low temperature proton implantation in c-Si and a-Si or H-doping of Si films introduces metastable hydrogen in the bond-centered-position (BCH), which dissociates with increasing temperatures into new metastable complexes. Using ab-initio molecular dynamics we report on the stability of BCH in crystalline Si and its temperature-induced dissociation products at close to solar cell operating temperatures, mainly the newly experimentally discovered H2** dimer, and the H2* dimer, as well as isolated interstitial hydrogen and monohydrides. Each complex leaves a characteristic signature in the frequency spectrum and in the imaginary part of the dielectric constant that agrees well with experiments. All complexes modify the vicinity of the energy gap of clean c-Si. BCH introduces characteristic donor levels just below the conduction band that are occupied, hence raising the Fermi energy considerably, and causing a strong peak in the imaginary part of the dielectric constant in the infrared. The H2** and H2* dimers introduce a low energy tail in the imaginary part of the dielectric constant. The results are important for experimental in-situ optical characterization of Si film growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207