MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060235532 · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1215458

<i>WNT1</i> Mutations in Early-Onset Osteoporosis and Osteogenesis Imperfecta

2013· article· en· W2060235532 on OpenAlexafffund
Christine Lainé, Kyu Sang Joeng, Philippe M. Campeau, Riku Kiviranta, Kati Tarkkonen, Monica Grover, James T. Lu, Minna Pekkinen, Maija Wessman, Terhi J. Heino, Vappu Nieminen-Pihala, Mira Aronen, Tero Laine, Heikki Kröger, William G. Cole, Anna‐Elina Lehesjoki, Lisette Nevarez, Deborah Krakow, Cynthia J. Curry, Daniel H. Cohn, Richard A. Gibbs, Brendan Lee, Outi Mäkitie

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesNational Human Genome Research InstituteEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentHoward Hughes Medical Institute
KeywordsOsteogenesis imperfectaMissense mutationWnt signaling pathwayNonsense mutationMutationOsteoporosisGeneticsMedicineLineage (genetic)BiologyGeneInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report identifies human skeletal diseases associated with mutations in WNT1. In 10 family members with dominantly inherited, early-onset osteoporosis, we identified a heterozygous missense mutation in WNT1, c.652T→G (p.Cys218Gly). In a separate family with 2 siblings affected by recessive osteogenesis imperfecta, we identified a homozygous nonsense mutation, c.884C→A, p.Ser295*. In vitro, aberrant forms of the WNT1 protein showed impaired capacity to induce canonical WNT signaling, their target genes, and mineralization. In mice, Wnt1 was clearly expressed in bone marrow, especially in B-cell lineage and hematopoietic progenitors; lineage tracing identified the expression of the gene in a subset of osteocytes, suggesting the presence of altered cross-talk in WNT signaling between the hematopoietic and osteoblastic lineage cells in these diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations356
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew England Journal of MedicineSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207