MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060261071 · doi:10.1115/imece2007-41151

Simulation of Flow and Conjugate Heat Transfer in a Macro-Channel via Lattice Boltzmann Method

2007· article· en· W2060261071 on OpenAlexaff
A. A. Mohamad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLattice Boltzmann methodsHeat transferMechanicsThermal conductionFluid dynamicsThermodynamicsForced convectionMacroPhysicsMaterials scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contributions of Prof. Kakac to the field of heat transfer, especially forced, internal flows for single and multiphase are significant and will leave with us for generations. It is an honor to celebrate Prof. Kakac’s 75th birthday with remembering his works. This paper is an attempt to produce some of Prof. Kakac’s old results on single phase flow in a duct with emerging method, Lattice Boltzmann Method. Also, to show the method’s capability in handling conjugate effect naturally. The fluxes (momentum and heat) are naturally conserved at the interface between solid and fluid. Conjugate effect becomes important in macro-flows, where the effect of axial heat conduction through the fluid conducting devices significantly affect the rate of heat transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207