MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060278275 · doi:10.1139/v00-121

Aqueous nonelectrolyte solutions. Part XVII. Formula of hydrogen sulfide hydrate and its dissociation thermodynamic functions

2000· article· en· W2060278275 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
D. N. Glew

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHydrateHydrogen sulfideClathrate hydrateThermodynamicsAqueous solutionHydrogenDissociation (chemistry)Vapor pressureSaturation (graph theory)SulfidePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistrySulfurPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Literature data for the saturation vapor pressure P(hl1g) of hydrogen sulfide hydrate with water, at 43 temperatures between quadruple points Q(hs1l1g) at –0.4°C and Q(hl1l2g) at 29.484°C, are properly represented by a six-parameter equation to give a standard error (SE) of 0.13% on a hydrate pressure measurement of unit weight. Equilibrium hydrogen sulfide and water fugacities and the gas and aqueous phase compositions are derived using the Redlich–Kwong equation of state. Literature data for the saturation vapor pressure P(hs1g) of hydrogen sulfide hydrate with ice, at 15 temperatures between –1.249 and –21.083°C, are properly represented by a two-parameter equation to give a SE of 0.26% on a single hydrate pressure measurement. Quadruple point Q(hs1l1g) is evaluated at temperature –0.413° with SE 0.042°C and at pressure 94.7 with SE 0.26 kPa. Using the thermodynamic method, described for deuterium sulfide D-hydrate, the equilibrium fugacities of hydrogen sulfide are used to define 43 equilibrium constants Kp(h[Formula: see text]l1g) for hydrate dissociation into water and hydrogen sulfide gas. The temperature dependence of ln Kp(h[Formula: see text]l1g) is represented by a three-parameter thermodynamic equation which gives both values and standard errors (i) for Kp(h[Formula: see text]l1g), and for δHot(h[Formula: see text]l1g) and δCpot(h[Formula: see text]l1g), the standard enthalpy and heat capacity changes for hydrate dissociation and (ii) for n = r the approximate formula number of the hydrate H2S·nH2O at each experimental temperature. The formula H2S·6.119H2O with standard error 0.029H2O is found for hydrogen sulfide hydrate with water at lower quadruple point Q(hs1l1g) –0.413°C: an approximate formula H2S·5.869H2O with SE 0.026H2O is found at upper quadruple point Q(hl1l2g) 29.484°C. These estimates for the formula of hydrogen sulfide hydrate at its quadruple points are not significantly different from those found for the deuterium sulfide D-hydrate.Key words: clathrate hydrate of hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen sulfide hydrate, formula of hydrogen sulfide hydrate, thermodynamics of clathrate hydrate dissociation, dissociation equilibrium constant of hydrogen sulfide hydrate, standard enthalpy and heat capacity changes for dissociation of hydrogen sulfide hydrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicChemical Thermodynamics and Molecular StructureFrench-language works237,207