Bibliographic record
Abstract
Histoire et anthropologie sensorielle Est-il possible de discerner rétrospectivement le mode de présence au monde des hommes du passé par l'analyse de la hiérarchie des sens et de la balance établie entre eux à un moment de l'histoire et au sein d'une société donnée ? Telle est la question que se pose l'auteur. Celui-ci analyse tout d'abord les difficultés auxquelles se heurte l'historien désireux de répondre à cette interrogation. Gêné par la fugacité de la trace, celui-ci doit en outre tenir compte de l'historicité des modalités de l'attention, de celle des systèmes de perceptions et d'appréciation, ainsi que de la configuration mouvante du tolérable et de l'intolérable. Il lui faut enfin se méfier du tableau de l'Autre décrété par les observateurs. L'organisation du régime sensoriel constitue en effet l'un des éléments majeurs du dessin de l'imaginaire social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".