MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060297281 · doi:10.5354/0719-3769.1994.15400

Medidas de confianza mutua y reacercamiento entre Cuba y los Estados Unidos

2011· article· es· W2060297281 on OpenAlex
Hal Klepak

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudios Internacionales · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCuban History and Society
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsContext (archaeology)Political scienceSituatedOrder (exchange)State (computer science)Welfare economicsWork (physics)HumanitiesSociologyGeographyLawBusinessComputer scienceEngineeringEconomicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mutual trust and security measures between nations (known as CSBM or CBM), have been incorporating a series of procedures whose ultimate purpose is to alleviate tensions and lessen the danger of an armed conflict breaking out as a consequence of a misinterpretation or miscalculation about the maneuvers of a rival state. In the present work, they are situated in the context of the current relations between Cuba and the United States, in order to consider whether it makes sense to seek CBMs that could reduce tension and create a more conducive political environment to improve relations between Havana and Washington. It is also analyzed whether there are no other ways, different from the one defined by these initiatives, to initiate a rapprochement process that future CBMs could later accelerate or consolidate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it