MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060311898 · doi:10.1021/jp0498365

Geometrical and Electronic Structure of the Pt<sub>7</sub> Cluster:  A Density Functional Study

2004· article· en· W2060311898 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Tian, Maofa Ge, Bhagawan Sahu, Dianxun Wang, Toshiki Yamada, Shinro Mashiko

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntibonding molecular orbitalMolecular orbitalNatural bond orbitalLocalized molecular orbitalsChemistryNon-bonding orbitalCluster (spacecraft)Electronic structureDensity functional theoryMolecular physicsPhysicsMolecular orbital theoryAtomic orbitalComputational chemistryMoleculeElectronQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a study on the structural and electronic properties of the Pt 7 cluster by using density functional theory within the generalized gradient approximation for the exchange and correlation. The structures, relative stabilities, and vibrational frequencies of various isomers are calculated and compared with the well-studied Au 7 cluster. The ground state of the Pt 7 cluster favors a three-dimensional geometry two-dimensional local minima are not located whereas for its neighbor, gold heptamer, a two-dimensional geometry is favored. The most stable isomer of Au 7 is found to be an edge-capped rhombus structure and an edge-capped tetrahedron structure is found to be the most stable three-dimensional local minimum. The ground state of the Pt 7 cluster is found to be a coupled tetragonal pyramid structure with the quintet state in contrast to a pentagonal bipyramid structure obtained by semiempirical molecular dynamics calculation. The natural orbital analysis shows that the overall charge transfer is from 6s to 5d orbitals in the Pt 7 cluster, whereas in Au 7 cluster it is from 5d to 6s. The molecular orbital picture shows that the bonding orbitals are due to the hybridization between 5d and 6s molecular orbitals in Pt 7 cluster, and the nonbonding and antibonding orbitals lie close to the highest occupied molecular orbital. This may be compared with the Au 7 electronic structure, where the nonbonding and antibonding orbitals mainly consists of 5d6s hybridized molecular orbitals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207