MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060330656 · doi:10.1353/mou.2010.0002

Magic in the Ancient Greek World (review)

2009· article· en· W2060330656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMAGIC (telescope)Argument (complex analysis)PremiseClassicsPublishingHistoryLiteratureArtEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Magic in the Ancient Greek World J.B. Rives Derek Collins. Magic in the Ancient Greek World. Maldon, MA/Oxford/Victoria: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. Pp. xiv + 207. US $99.95. ISBN 978-1-4051-3238-1 (hb). It is difficult to get a handle on magic, a problem that Derek Collins openly acknowledges in his lively new book. And if one’s brief is to write a book that could serve as a general introduction to the topic, which is the premise behind the Blackwell Ancient Religions series to which this volume belongs, that difficulty becomes all the more acute. Collins has met it in part by not attempting a comprehensive and systematic survey. What he offers instead is a set of five chapters that each explores a particular issue. Although the individual chapters to some extent constitute stand-alone studies, and could for example be effectively assigned as separate course readings, they also all work together to support the author’s central argument that magical practices “were operative within the same understandings of causality and agency that informed daily ancient life” (169). (For the sake of full disclosure, I should point out that the author thanks me in his preface, but that my chief contribution lay in providing him with a copy of an article in advance of publication.) Chapter 1 provides a survey of the major modern anthropological theories of magic, from Tylor and Frazer to Tambiah. Such surveys are common enough, but Collins constructs this one to call particular attention to what he later calls the “key notions of sympathy, analogy, agency, and participation” (166) that we must employ in trying to understand magical practices as the actual practitioners might have understood them. Turning from the general to the specific, in Chapter 2 he explores the conceptual framework of ancient Greek magic in particular. He begins by demonstrating that early Greek depictions of the gods credit them with practices that are indistinguishable from magic, moves on to the critiques of magic found in the Hippocratic treatise On the Sacred Disease and in Plato’s [End Page 89] Laws, and closes with a survey of the Greek terminology for magic. The centrepiece of this chapter is an analysis of Greek ideas of causality (based on his excellent earlier article “Nature, Cause and Agency in Greek Magic,” TAPA 133 [2003] 17–49); these, he emphasizes, allowed for multiple and overlapping causes, so that the identification of specific physical causes did not preclude a search for intentional causes as well, such as the ill will of a personal enemy. Collins develops his approach further in Chapter 3, on binding magic and erotic figurines. His argument here is that ancient Greeks tended to accept a much wider range of social actors than we do, including various sorts of superhuman beings on the one hand and statues and figurines on the other. Chapter 4 addresses the use of Homeric verses as charms and spells; Collins convincingly demonstrates that although in the earliest examples the context of the verse is important, the logic of the later examples, insofar as we can recreate it, ignores context altogether. He closes this chapter by suggesting that the Neoplatonic understanding of Homer may provide a clue to why his poems in particular were mined for charms; his argument is intriguing, although not to my mind fully convincing. In the fifth and final chapter Collins turns from the analysis of particular practices to an examination of the way such practices were conceptualized and criminalized in legal systems. Here too he builds on a valuable earlier paper (“Theories of Lemnos and the Criminalization of Magic in Fourth-Century Athens,” CQ 51 [2001] 477–93), expanding it to survey the much richer body of evidence for the legal treatment of magic in the Roman tradition. Although there are occasional problems with details (his account of the Corpus Iuris Civilis on p. 164 is a bit garbled, for example), it is useful to have a treatment of this topic that brings together both the Greek and the Roman material. As a general study of ancient Greek magic, the great contribution of Collins’ book is to set it firmly within...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it