MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2060330656 · doi:10.1353/mou.2010.0002

Magic in the Ancient Greek World (review)

2009· article· en· W2060330656 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueClassical Antiquity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMAGIC (telescope)Argument (complex analysis)PremiseClassicsPublishingHistoryLiteratureArtEpistemologyPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Magic in the Ancient Greek World J.B. Rives Derek Collins. Magic in the Ancient Greek World. Maldon, MA/Oxford/Victoria: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. Pp. xiv + 207. US $99.95. ISBN 978-1-4051-3238-1 (hb). It is difficult to get a handle on magic, a problem that Derek Collins openly acknowledges in his lively new book. And if one’s brief is to write a book that could serve as a general introduction to the topic, which is the premise behind the Blackwell Ancient Religions series to which this volume belongs, that difficulty becomes all the more acute. Collins has met it in part by not attempting a comprehensive and systematic survey. What he offers instead is a set of five chapters that each explores a particular issue. Although the individual chapters to some extent constitute stand-alone studies, and could for example be effectively assigned as separate course readings, they also all work together to support the author’s central argument that magical practices “were operative within the same understandings of causality and agency that informed daily ancient life” (169). (For the sake of full disclosure, I should point out that the author thanks me in his preface, but that my chief contribution lay in providing him with a copy of an article in advance of publication.) Chapter 1 provides a survey of the major modern anthropological theories of magic, from Tylor and Frazer to Tambiah. Such surveys are common enough, but Collins constructs this one to call particular attention to what he later calls the “key notions of sympathy, analogy, agency, and participation” (166) that we must employ in trying to understand magical practices as the actual practitioners might have understood them. Turning from the general to the specific, in Chapter 2 he explores the conceptual framework of ancient Greek magic in particular. He begins by demonstrating that early Greek depictions of the gods credit them with practices that are indistinguishable from magic, moves on to the critiques of magic found in the Hippocratic treatise On the Sacred Disease and in Plato’s [End Page 89] Laws, and closes with a survey of the Greek terminology for magic. The centrepiece of this chapter is an analysis of Greek ideas of causality (based on his excellent earlier article “Nature, Cause and Agency in Greek Magic,” TAPA 133 [2003] 17–49); these, he emphasizes, allowed for multiple and overlapping causes, so that the identification of specific physical causes did not preclude a search for intentional causes as well, such as the ill will of a personal enemy. Collins develops his approach further in Chapter 3, on binding magic and erotic figurines. His argument here is that ancient Greeks tended to accept a much wider range of social actors than we do, including various sorts of superhuman beings on the one hand and statues and figurines on the other. Chapter 4 addresses the use of Homeric verses as charms and spells; Collins convincingly demonstrates that although in the earliest examples the context of the verse is important, the logic of the later examples, insofar as we can recreate it, ignores context altogether. He closes this chapter by suggesting that the Neoplatonic understanding of Homer may provide a clue to why his poems in particular were mined for charms; his argument is intriguing, although not to my mind fully convincing. In the fifth and final chapter Collins turns from the analysis of particular practices to an examination of the way such practices were conceptualized and criminalized in legal systems. Here too he builds on a valuable earlier paper (“Theories of Lemnos and the Criminalization of Magic in Fourth-Century Athens,” CQ 51 [2001] 477–93), expanding it to survey the much richer body of evidence for the legal treatment of magic in the Roman tradition. Although there are occasional problems with details (his account of the Corpus Iuris Civilis on p. 164 is a bit garbled, for example), it is useful to have a treatment of this topic that brings together both the Greek and the Roman material. As a general study of ancient Greek magic, the great contribution of Collins’ book is to set it firmly within...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,950
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,379

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle