The evolution of amphibolites from Site 1067, ODP Leg 173 (Iberia Abyssal Plain): Jurassic rifting to the Pyrenean compression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract During ODP Leg 173 (April–May 1997) five new sites (1065, 1067–1070) were drilled at the ocean-continent transition (OCT) zone off the West Iberia margin in the Iberia Abyssal Plain. At Site 1067 the 92 m of cored amphibolites were subdivided into three units based on textural criteria. Unit 1 consists of highly foliated and folded amphibolites and acidic gneiss concordant to and folded along with the foliation of the amphibolite. Unit 2, in the middle part of the section, consists of brecciated amphibolites. Unit 3, at the bottom of the hole, is a weakly deformed zone where magmatic textures are observed in the amphibolites and in associated anorthosites. The amphibolites contain tschermakitic to magnesio-hornblende amphibole, plagioclase, zircon, apatite ± titanite ± Fe-oxide ± quartz. The acidic gneiss consists of garnet, plagioclase, alkali-feldspar, quartz, biotite and zircon. Chlorite, sericite and ilmenite occur as secondary phases. The metamorphic evolution of the amphibolite and acidic gneiss started under amphibolitefacies conditions (Stage I: 670 ± 40°C and 7 ± 1 kbar). Further exhumation took place through low-grade amphibolite-facies (Stage II: 550 ± 50°C and 5.5 ± 1 kbar) to green-schist-facies (Stage III: < 500°C and < 3 kbar) conditions contemporaneous with the development of ductile structures. The late metamorphic evolution of the amphibolite ended under ocean-floor conditions. Oxygen isotope ratios and studies of fluid inclusion indicate that a magmatic water-rich fluid in equilibrium with the igneous protolith predominated during Stage I. During Stages II and IIII low-temperature water-rich fluids of metamorphic origin predominated, with a probable contribution of sea water. Apatite fission-track dating indicates that the amphibolites record two thermal excursions below 120°C. The first took place atc.113–100 Ma and could be related to Cretaceous rifting. The second was brief, and so did not anneal older tracks; it occurred between 75 and 55 Ma and could be related to the Pyrenean orogeny.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".