MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060343400 · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.005

Comparison and Consensus Guidelines for Delineation of Clinical Target Volume for CT- and MR-Based Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

2014· article· en· W2060343400 on OpenAlexaff
Akila N. Viswanathan, Bradley A. Erickson, David K. Gaffney, Sushil Beriwal, Sudershan K. Bhatia, Omer L. Burnett, David D’Souza, Nikhilesh Patil, Michael G. Haddock, Anuja Jhingran, Ellen L. Jones, Charles A. Kunos, Larissa J. Lee, Lilie L. Lin, Nina A. Mayr, Ivy A. Petersen, Primož Petrič, Lorraine Portelance, William Small, Jonathan Strauss, Kanokpis Townamchai, Aaron H. Wolfson, Catheryn M. Yashar, Walter Bosch

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
FundersNational Cancer InstituteU.S. Public Health Service
KeywordsMedicineBrachytherapyCervical cancerStage (stratigraphy)Nuclear medicineMagnetic resonance imagingOvoidRadiation therapyRadiologyRadiation treatment planningCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.130
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.169
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1300.169
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.006
Bibliometrics0.0100.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0140.005
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations186
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*PhysicsSame topicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207