Circulating norepinephrine and cerebrovascular control in conscious humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cerebral vasoconstriction without concurrent changes in systemic arterial blood pressure has been observed in both normal individuals and those with idiopathic orthostatic intolerance following several minutes of postural stress when circulating catecholamines are elevated. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that alpha-adrenergic activation with and without elevated circulating norepinephrine (NE) directly affects cerebrovascular tone in healthy individuals. METHODS: Mean arterial pressure (MAP; tonometry) and cerebral blood flow velocity (MFV) in the middle cerebral artery (transcranial Doppler) were measured in seven healthy individuals during 15 min periods of saline and of 50 (low NE) and 100 (high NE) ng kg(-1) min(-1) infusions of NE. Following this, phentolamine (PHO) was administered to return MAP back to baseline while high NE infusion continued (high NE+PHO). Finally, NE infusion was stopped allowing the persistent effects of PHO to dominate. RESULTS: Circulating NE caused a dose-dependent increase in MAP (P<0.05). During combined high NE+PHO, blood pressure was initially reduced to baseline levels but then increased a second time (P<0.05) during the final approximately 5 min of this phase. MFV remained constant during both low NE and high NE. In contrast, the secondary increase in BP during the late high NE+PHO phase was associated with elevated MFV. Cerebral vascular resistance (CVR) increased during high NE but was reduced to baseline during both early and late portions of the combined high NE+PHO phase (i.e. despite the late-phase increase in blood pressure). CONCLUSIONS: The increase in CVR during NE infusion was explained by an autoregulatory response to the increased blood pressure and not an alpha-mediated constriction. However, PHO appeared to interfere with the normal autoregulatory response to increasing blood pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".