MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060388022 · doi:10.2307/2672286

Emerging Economic Systems in Asia: A Political and Economic Survey.

2000· article· en· W2060388022 on OpenAlex
Xiaoming Huang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Affairs · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Industrial and Economic Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsPolitical scienceEconomic systemDevelopment economicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TablesContributorsAbbreviations1. Introduction (Kyoko Sheridan)PART I The East Asian economies: industrial 'models' for the region.2. Japan's economic system (Kyoko Sheridan)3. Taiwan's Economic Success (Fred Robins)4. Emergence and Transformation of the South Korean Model (Sejin Pak)PART II The South-East Asian Economies: second tier Asian economies5. The ASEAN economies: growth and changes in newly-emerging socio-economic systems (Bruce McFarlane)6. The state and capitalist development in the Philippines (Bruce McFarlane) 7. Indonesia: The changing balance of commercial power? (Colin Brown)8. Overseas Chinese business in South East Asia (Colin Brown)PART III Market socialism in Asia9. Market socialism in South-East Asia: economics, society and politics in Vietnam, 1975-96 (Melanie Beresford and Bruce McFarlane)10. The Russian economy in transition: an overview (Louis Haddad)11. China (Richard Pomfret)12. Conclusion (Kyoko Sheridan)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it