Insights into the xenon–silver halide interaction from a rotational spectroscopic study of XeAgF and XeAgCl
Bibliographic record
Abstract
XeAgF and XeAgCl have been prepared by laser ablation of Ag metal in the presence of xenon and SF6 or xenon and Cl2, respectively. Rotational spectra for 12 isotopomers of XeAgF and 16 isotopomers of XeAgCl have been recorded. Analysis of the spectra indicates that (i) both chemical systems are unusually strongly bound compared to conventional van der Waals complexes, (ii) significant charge rearrangement occurs at the xenon nucleus upon formation of both XeAgF and XeAgCl as shown by the 131Xe nuclear quadrupole coupling constants and (iii) in both XeAgF and XeAgCl the Xe–Ag distance is small compared to the sum of the Xe van der Waals radius and the Ag+ ionic radius. An ab initio study of the two species has been performed. The combined experimental and theoretical investigations indicate that the Xe–Ag interaction is not easily described, but that there is some evidence for weak chemical bonding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".