MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060395367 · doi:10.1039/b404953p

Insights into the xenon–silver halide interaction from a rotational spectroscopic study of XeAgF and XeAgCl

2004· article· en· W2060395367 on OpenAlexaff
S.A. Cooke, Michael C. L. Gerry

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAmerican Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund
KeywordsXenonIsotopomersChemistryvan der Waals forceQuadrupoleVan der Waals radiusVan der Waals moleculeAb initio quantum chemistry methodsSpectral lineIonic radiusAb initioVan der Waals strainAtomic physicsIonic bondingMoleculePhysicsIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

XeAgF and XeAgCl have been prepared by laser ablation of Ag metal in the presence of xenon and SF6 or xenon and Cl2, respectively. Rotational spectra for 12 isotopomers of XeAgF and 16 isotopomers of XeAgCl have been recorded. Analysis of the spectra indicates that (i) both chemical systems are unusually strongly bound compared to conventional van der Waals complexes, (ii) significant charge rearrangement occurs at the xenon nucleus upon formation of both XeAgF and XeAgCl as shown by the 131Xe nuclear quadrupole coupling constants and (iii) in both XeAgF and XeAgCl the Xe–Ag distance is small compared to the sum of the Xe van der Waals radius and the Ag+ ionic radius. An ab initio study of the two species has been performed. The combined experimental and theoretical investigations indicate that the Xe–Ag interaction is not easily described, but that there is some evidence for weak chemical bonding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations99
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207