endomÉvaluation du risque de cancer du sein héréditaire : BRCA1 et BRCA2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La récente prolifération des travaux de recherche génétique sur le cancer du sein héréditaire a rehaussé notre compréhension des influences génétiques sur la santé et sur les maladies. Ces progrès scientifiques ont des répercussions importantes pour les infirmières cliniciennes en oncologie et les infirmières en pratique avancée. Les auteures de cet article utilisent le Human Response to Illness Model [modèle de réponse humaine à la maladie] (Mitchell, Gallucci & Fought, 1991) afin d’acquérir une compréhension approfondie du cancer du sein concernant la réponse humaine aux mutations génétiques. Il soulignera donc la documentation portant sur les perspectives physiologiques, pathophysiologiques, comportementales et expérientielles liées au cancer du sein dû à une mutation de BRCA. Ces résultats fondés sur la recherche procureront aux infirmières en oncologie les compétences leur permettant d’élaborer un plan de soins holistiques pour les femmes ayant un risque génétique—actuel ou éventuel—de cancer du sein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".