Synthesis of butyl rubber in hexane using a mixture of Et<sub>2</sub>AlCl and EtAlCl<sub>2</sub> in the initiating system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A method was studied to obtain butyl rubber in hexane at −75 and −60°C using a mixture of a major amount of diethylaluminum chloride and a minor amount of ethylaluminum dichloride in the initiating system. The Jaacks method was used to determine the monomer reactivity ratio of isobutylene in copolymerization with isoprene in hexane at −75°C with the above initiating system; r IB = 1.54 ± 0.06. This value was different from a literature value r IB = 1.08 when just EtAlCl 2 was used in hexane at −80°C. The mixture of both alkylaluminum chlorides in the initiating solution was subsequently directly activated with minute amounts of water or methylaluminoxane (MAO). The use of the modified initiators resulted in higher molecular weights, higher degrees of conversion, and higher isoprene contents in the butyl rubber. At the same time, temperature control was good during polymerizations. With modified alkylaluminum halides, the monomer reactivity ratio of isobutylene in copolymerization with isoprene in hexane at −75°C was close to unity, similar to the reported case with just EtAlCl 2 . The system activated with MAO made it possible to synthesize butyl rubber in hexane at −60°C having main characteristics typical of commercial butyl rubber manufactured in methyl chloride at −95°C. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 2360–2364, 2003
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".