MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060473677 · doi:10.1109/tste.2013.2282077

Modeling, Prediction, and Experimental Validations of Power Peaks of PV Arrays Under Partial Shading Conditions

2014· article· en· W2060473677 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShadingIrradiancePhotovoltaic systemPower (physics)Series (stratigraphy)Solar irradianceMaximum power principleElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringOpticsPhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mismatch losses of photovoltaic (PV) arrays under partially shaded conditions are examined in this paper. Electrical models of PV arrays under different irradiance levels and temperatures are developed. These models form the basis for the development of the power peak prediction schemes for PV arrays with series-parallel, bridge-linked, and total-cross-tied configurations. The developed schemes have been validated using commercial PV modules under different irradiance levels and partial shading conditions. The experimental results have confirmed that the power peak prediction schemes can successfully identify the most efficient configuration under any given partial shading conditions. Furthermore, the predicted power peaks are within 5% of the true measured ones under almost all the cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it