MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060481500 · doi:10.4161/worm.29047

Deciphering genetic interactions between ALS genes using<i>C. elegans</i>

2014· article· nl· W2060481500 on OpenAlexaff
Martine Therrien, J. Alex Parker

Bibliographic record

VenueWorm · 2014
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsC9orf72Amyotrophic lateral sclerosisNeurodegenerationFrontotemporal dementiaTARDBPGeneBiologyGeneticsCaenorhabditis elegansNeuroscienceDementiaMutantSOD1DiseaseTrinucleotide repeat expansionMedicineAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder causing selective death of motor neurons in which it is speculated that 10% of cases have a familial history. In the past 20 years, many genes causative for ALS have been discovered, but the link between them and their roles in neurodegeneration remain unknown. The identification of genes associated with both ALS and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), along with the observation of patients affected by both diseases, have suggested that they are part of the same neurodegenerative spectrum. Investigating possible genetic interactions among ALS/FTD genes could help understand the role of these genes in neurodegeneration. To pursue this goal, our group has developed several ALS models to study potential genetic interactions. More recently, we characterized the deletion mutant alfa-1, the ortholog of C9ORF72, to evaluate the potential genetic interactions between C9ORF72/alfa-1 and other ALS genes. Here, we discuss the genetic interactions identified in our models and how some of these proteins may also be linked to other neurodegenerative disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWormSame topicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFrench-language works237,207