Fluidelastic Instability of Flexible Tubular Cylinders Subjected to Two-Phase Internal Flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fluidelastic instability behaviour of flexible cylinders subjected to internal single-phase (liquid or gas) flows is now reasonably well understood. Although many piping systems operate in two-phase flows, so far very little work has been done to study their dynamic behaviour under such flows. This paper presents the results of a series of experiments to study the fluidelastic instability behaviour of flexible tubular cylinders subjected to two-phase internal flow. Several flexible cylinders of different diameters, lengths and flexural rigidities were tested over a broad range of flow velocities and void fractions in an air-water loop to simulate two-phase flows. Well-defined fluidelastic instabilities were observed in two-phase flows. The existing theory to formulate the fluidelastic behaviour under internal flow was developed further to take into account two-phase flow. The agreement between the experimental results and the modified theory is remarkably good. However, it depends on using an appropriate model to formulate the characteristics of the two-phase flows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".