MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060513928 · doi:10.1021/jp0278465

Perturbation of Charge-Transfer Complexes in Aqueous Solutions of PEG-DNB by Adding <i>N</i>-Ethylcarbazole and Li<sup>+</sup> Cations

2003· article· en· W2060513928 on OpenAlexaff
G. Cojocariu, Almeria Natansohn

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthylene glycolAqueous solutionPEG ratioChemistryIntramolecular forceEtherDissolutionCrystallographyPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intramolecular charge-transfer (CT) complexation occurring in aqueous solutions of poly(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether (PEG) capped at one end with a 3,5-dinitrobenzoyl (DNB) group was perturbed by compounds that interact with either the donor PEG chains or the acceptor DNB group. Hydrophobic N -ethylcarbazole (NEK) can be solubilized in aqueous solutions by the PEG-DNB complex surfactant. CT interactions between the NEK solute and the hydrophobic part of the surfactant, the DNB group, favor the solubilization process. The symmetric coplanar sandwich geometry of the NEK/DNB complex does not interfere with the PEG/DNB complex because of the sidewise orientation of the polyether chain. Thus, DNB forms complexes simultaneously with a π-electron donor, NEK, and a p-electron donor, PEG. An interesting consequence of the dual complex is the substantial increase in molecular weight resolution in the NMR spectra. Dissolving LiClO 4 in aqueous solutions of PEG-DNB produces decomplexation. Li + cations form ion−dipole interactions with PEG and remove it from its coiled complex with DNB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207