MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A TWO DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS TECHNIQUE COMBINING A MICRO‐ AND A MINI‐GEL SYSTEM FOR PROTEOMIC ANALYSIS OF FUNGAL HEAT SHOCK PROTEINS

2003· article· en· W2060525519 on OpenAlexaff
Ilungo J. Xavier, George G. Khachatourians

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rapid Methods & Automation in Microbiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsoelectric focusingSilver stainTwo-dimensional gel electrophoresisProteomeGel electrophoresisElectrophoresisHeat shock proteinChromatographyStainingDifference gel electrophoresisPulsed-field gel electrophoresisChemistryBiologyMolecular biologyProteomicsBiochemistryEnzymeGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis (2‐DGE) technique is described here that combines isoelectric focusing (IEF) based separation of proteins using the PhastGel IEF in the first dimension and the Criterion precast mini‐gels in the second dimension. The technique is rapid (2.5 to 3 h including silver staining), convenient, sensitive with high resolution and enables simultaneous analysis of up to 24 samples. This technique also eliminates any inconsistencies arising from gel to gel variation, either from electrophoresis running conditions or differential staining times, especially as in the case of silver stains. The rapidity and efficacy of this technique is demonstrated by the proteome‐based analysis of the induction, enhancement and repression of proteins in heat shocked Beauveria bassiana, ah entomopathogenic fungus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Rapid Methods & Automation in MicrobiologySame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207