Relative reactivity of different monovalent alkalis on poly(ethylene terephthalate) geotextiles: Aqueous and alcoholic systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relative rate of degradation of poly(ethylene terephthalate) geotextiles in various monovalent alkali hydroxides was studied in both aqueous and alcoholic systems. In an aqueous system, the reaction of all three alkalis on poly(ethylene terephthalate) geotextiles is restricted to the surface since tenacity loss was insignificant and no surface cracks was noticed, whereas in an alcoholic system, significant loss in tenacity occurred due to the formation of surface crack. Furthermore, the relative rate of reactivity of metal hydroxides in aqueous and alkaline media was temperature dependent. However, in equimolar concentration, at 80℃, the relative rate in an aqueous system is of the following order: LiOH > NaOH > KOH in the ratio of 1.65:1.1:1.0. Above 80℃, the reaction is reversed, as aqueous KOH reacts faster than aqueous NaOH. Two different activation energies were found for aqueous KOH at a threshold temperature of 80℃. Furthermore, in heterogeneous systems using dimethyl terephthalate, aqueous KOH was slightly faster than aqueous NaOH in the temperature range of 70–80℃. In an alcoholic system, KOH is almost 1.5 times faster than NaOH at 20℃ and at 60℃.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".