High temperature polymorphism of Pr metal: possible disordered polytype structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have developed high-temperature techniques to measure in situ neutron powder diffraction and synchrotron x-ray powder diffraction.The new furnace for high-temperature neutron diffraction study does not yield any extra peaks due to heaters and refractory, thus we are able to easily measure very small neutron peaks from the sample.Quality neutron-diffraction data at high temperatures up to 1600ºC were analyzed by Rietveld method for various materials as calcium titanate, yttrium tantalate and silicon nitride.The tilting of Ti-O octahedra was found to be the key to understand the phase transitions in the calcium titanate.The high-resolution synchrotron X-ray diffraction enabled to determine exactly the unit-cell parameters around a phase transition point and the phase transition temperatures of perovskite-related materials as A-site deficient lanthanum titanate and barium titanate.The axial ratio b/a of orthorhombic lanthanum titanate continuously decreased with an increase of temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".