Web-Integration PROAFTN Methodology for Acute Leukemia Diagnosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a web-based Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) tool, which integrated a new fuzzy multiple criteria classification methodology named PROAFTN in acute leukemia (AL) diagnosis. METHODS: We have integrated a PROAFTN method and developed a web-based clinical decision support system using standard JSP, servlets, and XML technologies. All website data are database-driven; and the database system can handle data store, update, and retrieval instantly. Since the system was moved to a web server, we have started our experimental testing on 191 AL cases. RESULTS: The percentage of correct classification in this experimental testing was consistent with the proposed prototype. 96.4% of AL cases were correctly classified, proving that web-integration can be a promising tool for dissemination of CDSS tools. We found our system to be robust and capable of deployment for referring physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Our experimental results suggest that the Internet has promise as a means for distribution of CDSS tools. This system will help to: 1) make a "virtual" diagnosis and to compare its performances with given clinical diagnosis; 2) exchange health information between physicians and hematologists at the location and time of need; 3) assist online learning and simulate cases for training practitioners; 4) implement a strict security and access control for transmission of electronic health data through the Internet. The method will not replace specialists, but was developed to assist biologist-hematologists and general practitioners remotely in making decisions on medical diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".