MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060611718 · doi:10.1002/arch.10097

Kinases, intracellular calcium, and apolipophorin‐III influence the adhesion of larval hemocytes of the lepidopterous insect, <i>Galleria mellonella</i>

2003· article· en· W2060611718 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Zakarian, Gary B. Dunphy, Manfred E. Rau, Paul Albert

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicInvertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalleria mellonellaProtein kinase CBiologyCell biologyTyrosine kinaseKinaseAdhesionBiochemistrySignal transductionChemistryVirulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the results from the use of selective inhibitors and activators, active protein kinase A, protein tyrosine kinase, and protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms decreased the adhesion of larval Galleria mellonella hemocytes to glass slides. The protein kinase A inhibitor at all concentrations increased granular cell adhesion only whereas protein tyrosine kinase elevated both granular and plasmatocyte attachment at the lowest concentration. Active, Ca(2+)- and lipid-dependent PKC isoforms limited plasmatocyte and granular cell adhesion whereas PKC that was inhibited by selected compounds (with differed modes of PKC inhibition) enhanced hemocyte attachment. The granular cells were more sensitive to the PKC inhibitors than were plasmatocytes. Phospholipase C and its diacylglyceride product were necessary to reduce hemocyte adhesion and maintain PKC activity. Extracellular Ca(2+), possibly transported through L-channels, was required for plasmatocyte attachment. In contrast, lowering the levels of cytosolic Ca(2+) was associated with decreased PKC activity and was required for hemocyte adhesion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.686

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Insect Biochemistry and PhysiologySame topicInvertebrate Immune Response MechanismsFrench-language works237,207