Toward blind reverberation time estimation for non-speech signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reverberation time (RT) is an important parameter for room acoustics characterization, intelligibility and quality assessment of reverberant speech, and for dereverberation. Commonly, RT is estimated from the room impulse response (RIR). In practice, however, RIRs are often unavailable or continuously changing. As such, blind estimation of RT based only on the recorded reverberant signals is of great interest. To date, blind RT estimation has focused on reverberant speech signals. Here, we propose to blindly estimate RT from non-speech signals, such as solo instrument recordings and music ensembles. To estimate the RT of non-speech signals, we propose a blind estimator based on an auditory-inspired modulation spectrum signal representation, which measures the modulation frequency of temporal envelopes computed from a 23-channel gammatone filterbank. We show that the higher modulation frequency bands are more sensitive to reverberation than the modulation bands below 20 Hz. When tested on a database of non-speech sounds under 23 different reverberation conditions with early decay time (EDT) ranging from 0.26 to 7.6 s, a blind estimator based on the ratio of high-to-low modulation frequencies outperformed two state-of-the-art methods and achieved correlations with EDT as high as 0.80 for solo instruments and 0.75 for ensembles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".