The new antiarrhythmic drug vernakalant: ex vivo study of human atrial tissue from sinus rhythm and chronic atrial fibrillation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Vernakalant is a newly developed antiarrhythmic drug against atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its electrophysiological actions on human myocardium are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Action potentials (APs) and ion currents were recorded in right atrial trabeculae and cardiomyocytes from patients in sinus rhythm (SR) and chronic AF. Vernakalant prolonged early repolarization in SR and AF, but late only in AF. AP amplitude (APA) and dV/dtmax were reduced in a concentration- and frequency-dependent manner with IC50 < 10 µM at >3 Hz. Effective refractory period was increased more than action potential duration (APD) in SR and AF. INa was blocked with IC50s of 95 and 84 µM for SR and AF, respectively (0.5 Hz). Vernakalant did not reduce outward potassium currents compared with time-matched controls. However, area under the current-time curve was reduced due to acceleration of current decline with IC50s of 19 and 12 µM for SR and AF, respectively. Vernakalant had less effect on APD than the IKr blocker E-4031, blocked IK,ACh, and had a small inhibitory effect on IK1 at 30 µM. L-Type Ca(2+) currents (SR) were reduced with IC50 of 84 µM. CONCLUSION: Rate-dependent block of Na(+) channels represents the main antiarrhythmic mechanism of vernakalant in the fibrillating atrium. Open channel block of early transient outward currents and IK,ACh could also contribute.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it