Synthesis and In Vitro Biocompatibility Assessment of a Poly(amic acid) Derived from Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Dianhydride
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poly(amic acid) (PAA) derived from ethylenediaminetetracetic dianhydride shows great potential as a biomaterial suitable for biomedical applications. To evaluate this polymer class further, in vitro cell toxicity (WST-1/ECS, ELISA based) and cell compatibility (cell adhesion and cell proliferation) tests were conducted to establish structure-toxicity relationships. PAAs with a number-average molecular weight ranging between 100 to 200 kg/mol were synthesized at 37°C after 24 h. Porcine radial artery cells (RACs) and descending aorta endothelial cells (ECs) were seeded independently in a 96-well cell culture plate at a cell density of 5000 cells/cm(2) to observe toxic effects. Similarly, RACs and ECs were seeded independently onto PAA coated and uncoated cover slips at a cell density of 7000 cells/cm(2) to observe growth patterns. Our results showed no toxicity after 96 h of incubation and in addition, both RACs and ECs adhered and proliferated on the PAA films, preserving their phenotype during this time. The tested synthetic material seems promising as a future biomaterial and should elicit a desired cellular response upon implantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it