MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060630027 · doi:10.1089/ham.2010.1030

Evidence for a Genetic Basis for Altitude Illness: 2010 Update

2010· review· en· W2060630027 on OpenAlexafffund
Martin J. MacInnis, Michael S. Koehle, Jim L. Rupert

Bibliographic record

VenueHigh Altitude Medicine & Biology · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAltitude (triangle)High-altitude pulmonary edemaEffects of high altitude on humansEtiologyAltitude sicknessMedicineBiologyInternal medicinePulmonary edema

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Altitude illness refers to a group of environmentally mediated pathophysiologies. Many people will suffer acute mountain sickness shortly after rapidly ascending to a moderately hypoxic environment, and an unfortunate few will develop potentially fatal conditions such as high altitude pulmonary edema or high altitude cerebral edema. Some individuals seem to be predisposed to developing altitude illness, suggesting an innate contribution to susceptibility. The implication that there are altitude-sensitive and altitude-tolerant individuals has stimulated much research into the contribution of a genetic background to the efficacy of altitude acclimatization. Although the effect of altitude attained and rate of ascent on the etiology of altitude illness is well known, there are only tantalizing, but rapidly accumulating, clues to the genes that may be involved. In 2006, we reviewed what was then known about the genetics of altitude illness. This article updates that review and attempts to tabulate all the available genetic data pertaining to these conditions. To date, 58 genes have been investigated for a role in altitude illness. Of these, 17 have shown some association with the susceptibility to, or the severity of, these conditions, although in many cases the effect size is small or variable. Caution is recommended when evaluating the genes for which no association was detected, because a number of the investigations reviewed in this article were insufficiently powered to detect small effects. No study has demonstrated a clear-cut altitude illness gene, but the accumulating data are consistent with a polygenic condition with a strong environmental component. The genes that have shown an association affect a variety of biological pathways, suggesting that either multiple systems are involved in altitude pathophysiology or that gene-gene interactions play a role. Although numerous studies have been performed to investigate specific genes, few have looked for evidence of heritability or familial transmission, or for epidemiological patterns that would be consistent with genetically influenced conditions. Future trends, such as genome-wide association studies and epigenetic analysis, should lead to enhanced understanding of the complex interactions within the genome and between the genome and hypoxic environments that contribute to an individual's capacity to acclimatize rapidly and effectively to altitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigh Altitude Medicine & BiologySame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207