MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060635122 · doi:10.1080/10824000209480568

Global Differential GPS Positioning without Using a Base Station

2002· article· en· W2060635122 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of GIS · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemDifferential GPSPrecise Point PositioningComputer scienceDifferential (mechanical device)Base stationPrecision Lightweight GPS ReceiverCode (set theory)Real-time computingHybrid positioning systemData processingPoint (geometry)Remote sensingAssisted GPSPositioning systemTelecommunicationsGeographyGNSS applicationsGps receiverEngineeringDatabaseAerospace engineeringSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Stand-alone GPS is currently capable of providing positioning solutions at accuracy from several meters up to several tens of meters. To obtain a better positioning accuracy, differential GPS techniques must be used including wide area differential GPS networks. Significant efforts are currently underway to develop new processing methods to allow stand-alone point positioning to achieve accuracy at a decimeter to centimeter level. This paper describes the concept of global DGPS positioning without the use of base stations. In addition to the conventional code-based data processing method, a carrier phase based data processing technique has been described in this paper along with test result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it