MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060688925 · doi:10.2174/1389200043489045

Expression of Cytochrome P450 in Lung Tumor

2004· review· en· W2060688925 on OpenAlexaff
Negar Gharavi, Ayman O.S. El‐Kadi

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Drug Metabolism · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytochrome P450Lung cancerDrugDrug metabolismEnzymeLungPharmacologyCancer researchMetabolismBiologyMedicinePathologyInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes have the capability of playing key metabolic roles in several aspects of cancer as a consequence of their unusually broad substrate specificities. CYP450 are also prominent players in the metabolism of anticancer therapeutic drugs, enhancing or diminishing the efficacy of the drugs depending on whether the drug or its metabolites are efficacious. As CYP450 enzymes are also found in lung tissue, lung metabolism can be of importance to the bioactivation of some anticancer agents. The presence of individual forms of CYP450 has been investigated in lung tumor to determine whether intra-tumor metabolism of anticancer agents by CYP450 could occur and thus influence the response of tumor to these agents. Differences in drug metabolism between normal and cancerous lung tissue have been shown to exist, therefore; the variable expression of CYP450 between tumor and normal tissue can provide a basis for selective sensitivity of tissue to anticancer drugs, thereby localizing drug actions to tumor. This review gives a detailed picture of the expression of CYP450 in lung tumor and the role of this enzyme in lung tumor in the fate of anticancer drugs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Drug MetabolismSame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207