MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060698688 · doi:10.3138/ctr.143.29

Searching for Poetry: On Collective Collaboration in Wajdi Mouawad's Theatre

2010· article· en· W2060698688 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLanguage, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryLyricismEmbodied cognitionPower (physics)ArtCollective intelligenceVisual artsAestheticsTheatre directorProcess (computing)LiteratureSociologyComputer sciencePhilosophyEpistemologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improvised dialogue, Wajdi Mouawad claims, does not constitute a production-forming part in his creative process. It is collective collaboration that informs his experience as a playwright and as a director. For each show he produces, Mouawad creates a new collective that he leads in dreaming up the situations and characters of a future play. Thus, unlike in the practice of collective creation, when a company is subjected to complex power-related issues, the collaboration in Mouawad's theatre is used as playwright's laboratory and excludes the uncertainty of authorship. The theatre of poetry sees dramatic text as the ultimate outcome of a collective effort. Here everything and everybody is called to serve the lyricism, the rhythms and the sound design of the text to be embodied on the stage and graphically laid out on the page.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it