MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060698953 · doi:10.1080/09695958.2013.771123

Is access to the profession access to justice? Lessons from Canada

2012· article· en· W2060698953 on OpenAlex
Avner Levin, Asher Alkoby

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of the Legal Profession · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegal professionEconomic JusticeDiversity (politics)Legal servicePerceptionPolitical scienceRepresentation (politics)White (mutation)LawPublic relationsPublic administrationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada, and within it the Province of Ontario, has not had a new law school in over 30 years. A combination of factors discussed in this paper has caused access to the profession to be quite limited. At the same time, the cost of legal services has increased, putting legal representation outside the reach of the lower and middle classes. In addition, diversity within the legal profession has not improved, leading to the perception of a profession dominated by ‘old white males’. The paper discusses whether in light of these factors, greater access to the legal profession, in terms of absolute numbers coupled with the removal of societal barriers, would lead to improved access to justice for Canadians.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it