Methemoglobin levels in umbilical cord blood of women with intrauterine growth restriction and preeclampsia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure nitric oxide (NO) levels, as assessed by methemoglobin (MetHb), in the umbilical cord arterial blood of women with preeclampsia (PE), normotensive pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR, <10th percentile for birth weight) and normotensive pregnancies with appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants. DESIGN/METHODS: Prospective analysis of MetHb levels in umbilical arterial blood of pregnancies with PE, normotensive IUGR and normotensive AGA infants using spectrophotometry. Exclusion criteria included cigarette smoke exposure, hemolytic disorders, chronic hypertension, any significant medical illness and medications affecting NO or MetHb levels. RESULTS: There were 42 women in the PE, 42 in the AGA and 37 in the IUGR group. Maternal age, mode of delivery, gravidity, parity and infant gender were similar in the three groups. MetHb levels were significantly lower in the IUGR group compared to the AGA group (p < 0.01). MetHb levels, while higher in the PE group compared to the AGA group, did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that NO may play a key role in the pathogenesis of IUGR. We also, for the first time, provide information on umbilical arterial MetHb levels in PE, normotensive IUGR and normotensive AGA pregnancies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".