MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2060703722 · doi:10.1139/x05-287

Cambial activity of <i>Populus tremula</i> × <i>Populus alba</i> clone 717-1B4 in hydroponic culture

2006· article· en· W2060703722 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Domenico Morabito, Aurore Caruso, Sabine Carpin, Cédric Carli, Françoise Laurans, Christiane Depierreux, G. Kahlem, Philippe Label

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyBotanyXylemNutrientclone (Java method)SalicaceaeSecondary growthWoody plantEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Populus tremula Michx. × Populus alba L. clone 717-1B4 plants were grown in a hydroponic system in an effort to detect cambial activity in a changing nutrient environment. The secondary growth of the stem was determined by automated measurement of radial growth, as well as by histological study. This is the first time poplar cambial activity has been recorded in a hydroponic system. Further, we demonstrate that nutrient limitations can be tested with progressive deprivation of liquid medium. The system lends itself to measurements of stomatal conductance, primary stem growth, leaf growth, and radial stem growth. In this study we found that primary and secondary growth were affected by nutrient solution limitations. This hydroponic system will be valuable in elucidating the impact of environmental, physiological, and molecular factors on cambial activity and wood formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest Research→Same topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics→French-language works237,207→