MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060710173 · doi:10.1061/41098(368)115

Construction Management of a Marine Terminal Expansion

2010· article· en· W2060710173 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sid Sridhar, Mark Mattila, Ray Collier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsShell (Canada)Victoria General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerminal (telecommunication)Submarine pipelineDowntimeAggregate (composite)Civil engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceTelecommunicationsGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The expansion of an operating marine terminal is often complicated by the need to maintain existing operations without interference while new development is taking place in its midst. Construction Aggregates Limited (now Lehigh Northwest Materials Ltd.) operates British Columbia's largest sand and gravel mine at Sechelt, near Vancouver. In March 2000, Construction Aggregates Limited of Vancouver, British Columbia awarded a design/build contract to Seabulk Systems Inc. of Richmond, British Columbia to design and construct a new marine bulk aggregate load out terminal for coastal barges and deep-sea Panamax bulk carriers at Sechelt. Owner requirements that challenged the design and management team included keeping the existing bulk load out facility operational without interference to shipping activity while the new offshore conveying and marine infrastructure was built. Additionally, the maximum operational downtime for transfer from the old to the new facilities was not to exceed two weeks. This paper discusses the design, construction and management decisions that led to the successful implementation of a design/build bulk aggregate facility expansion within fifteen months of contract award.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207