MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060716514 · doi:10.1063/1.2212107

Electrostatic field induced patterning: A method for controlling the anisotropy of thin films of polar organic molecules

2006· article· en· W2060716514 on OpenAlexaff
Sven Verpoort, A. Draude, Rafael Meinhardt, H. Franke, R. A. Lessard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnisotropyMaterials scienceThin filmElectric fieldElectrostaticsMoleculeChemical physicsChemical polarityElectrical conductorOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryNanotechnologyOpticsComposite materialOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The molecular orientation of anisotropic organic molecules also depends on the presence of electrostatic charges on the surface of low conductive substrates. Unknown charges may be the origin of poor reproducibility, while controlled charge patterns may be used as a tool for the preparation of partly oriented films. Different techniques for the creation of surface charge patterns have been applied: friction with a pen or brush, corona discharge, sliding electrical contact wire, exposure with ultraviolet light (UV exposure), and electron-beam (e-beam) recording. The orientational order was checked by measuring the angular dependence of the absorption constant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207