MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060736946 · doi:10.1080/08941930290085859

Multiple In Vivo Liver Biopsies Using a Freeze-Clamping Technique

2002· article· en· W2060736946 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Investigative Surgery · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIn vivoLiver biopsyBiopsyPerfusionClampForcepsRadiologySurgeryClamping

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multiple in vivo liver biopsy technique was developed to measure labile metabolites (creative phosphate [CP], ATP, lactate) without interfering with normal perfusion and metabolism. Anesthetized rats (n = 7) had a midline abdominal incision done to expose the liver. Four biopsies were taken across 20 min. Bleeding was controlled by a small, nontraumatic clamp proximal to the biopsy. Prefrozen dressing forceps grasped the liver and scissors cut the biopsy, which was frozen in liquid nitrogen. Bleeding was minimal and hemodynamic stability was preserved. This technique has few complications, bleeding is easily controlled, and it allows for large multiple biopsies, which give reliable metabolic data and can be consistently taught.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it