Cardiac response to hemodialysis with different cardiovascular tolerance: Heart rate variability and QT interval analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A therapy-specific worsening of cardiovascular stability during bicarbonate dialysis (BD) with respect to acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) have been previously reported. We further investigated the impact of the 2 therapies on electrocardiographic parameters in order to gain novel insight into the cardiac responses. Holter ECG acquired during hypotension-free sessions (12 BD + 12 AFB) were retrospectively analyzed. R-R intervals were extracted from ECG recordings. An autoregressive spectral technique was used to compute low- and high-frequency (LF and HF) components of heart rate variability (HRV). QT interval duration was measured with a computer-assisted technique and corrected for HR. In BD the LF component of HRV after an initial increase was slowly depressed with respect to AFB (p < 0.05). QT duration showed a significant (p < 0.01) hemodialysis-induced reduction. QT shortening was more pronounced (p < 0.05) in BD than in AFB (-31 vs. -10 ms), even after correction for HR (p < 0.05). Cardiac electrical activity is significantly affected by the hemodialysis technique. The decrease in the LF component of HRV and the QT shortening are coherent with the worse cardiovascular tolerance observed in BD and with the hypothesis of an enhanced production of endogenous nitric oxide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".