MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2060773291 · doi:10.1029/1999ja000417

Small‐scale vortices in the high‐latitude <i>F</i> region

2000· article· en· W2060773291 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthias Huber, G. J. Sofko

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonospherePhysicsMagnetosheathGeophysicsRadarSpectral lineBackscatter (email)MagnetosphereComputational physicsField lineF regionGeologyPlasmaMagnetopauseAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dayside outer magnetosphere is a region of direct interaction with the shocked solar wind in the magnetosheath, resulting in plasma and hydromagnetic waves and spatial turbulence which map along the Earth's magnetic field lines down to the ionosphere where the waves and/or turbulence can be detected directly by radar scattering from the associated electron density variations. In a previous paper by Schiffler et al. [1997] it was reported that double‐peaked (D‐P) velocity spectra measured by the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) HF radars are a signature of backscatter from the ionospheric footprint of the outer low‐latitude boundary layer (LLBL). In the present statistical study, Saskatoon HF radar data are used to determine the ionospheric location at which D‐P HF spectra originate and to confirm the previous result that the majority of the D‐P spectra are associated with the ionospheric cusp/cleft region. Employing high spatial (15 km) and high temporal (3 s) resolution modes, we establish an upper limit of ∼ 26 km on the scale size and ∼4 s on the lifetime of the structures producing the echoes showing D‐P spectra. We postulate a number of mechanisms that could cause D‐P spectra and conclude that ionospheric vortices appear to be the most likely explanation of the radar observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→